FORGERIES, LIES, AND FANTASIES: The Truth About Dinosaurs!
|
Written by Mary Nell Wyatt |
|
Saturday, 02 October 1993
|
|
HOW WERE DINOSAUR BONES FOSSILIZED?
WHY WERE DINOSAURS SO BIG? Everyone loves dinosaurs! Millions and
millions of dollars are spent on dinosaur movies, toys, t-shirts,
and in fact, anything about dinosaurs. But let's take a closer look
at "dinosaurs" as we know them today. Sure, the fossil bones are
real, but the true facts about them have been buried- replaced by
theories which are positively stated as "fact" but that are really
just that - theories. The sad truth is that the study of
these giant fossil bones has, from the beginning, been based on the
conjectures of men who have completely discarded any belief in the
Biblical record. In fact, these wild theories are today taught as
actual reality in our schools and universities- a strategy designed
by Satan, himself, to discredit the Bible. In Genesis, when
God created the animals, He called them, as well as His entire
creation "very good", which indicates His complete satisfaction with
them. (Gen. 1:20-31.) We are also told that He created all animals
to be herbivores, or plant eaters. (v.30). But in time, something
happened to His perfect creation for soon we are told that He
"repented" of ever creating both man and animal: GEN 6:7
"And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the
face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and
the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them."
GEN 7:14
"They, and every 'beast' [living thing] after his kind, and all the
'cattle' [beast] after their kind, and every 'creeping thing' that
creepeth upon the earth after his kind, and every 'fowl' after his
kind, every 'bird" of every sort.'
Were Dinosaurs on the Ark? The key word in the above verse is
"kind"- the Bible says that God preserved at least two of every
"kind" of animal that He had created. Many people equate this word
"kind" with "species", but we believe it should instead be equated
with the word "genus". To understand these classifications,
we will present one simple example. "Feline" is a "genus"
classification. The "Feline genus" contains many, many "species",
such as lions, panthers, tigers, leopards, the common cat, etc. For
a moment, let's assume there were just two members of the "feline
genus" on the ark. After the flood, these two cats and their
offspring eventually produced every various species of cat we
presently have on the earth today. And there could have been other
species of felines on the earth before the flood who were not
represented in the gene pool of the two cat members on the ark.
If this were the case, it would be
very likely that fossils of the "feline genus" could exist which are
today unknown, or "extinct". And sure enough, that's exactly the
case. Bones have been found of animals identical to those we have
today, but some have been found of species which do not exist today.
Take the classic case that Darwin quotes- the pigeon. He found that
if the almost endless varieties of pigeons were allowed to breed
together, they went back to the rock pigeon; therefore if there were
seven rock pigeons in the ark, there were thousands of varieties
potentially preserved. The same may be said about others, e.g., the
dog. After all, we don't have saber-toothed
tigers today, do we? They are an extinct "species", but they are of
the "feline genus", which does exist today. The bottom line is
simply this- no one knows for sure exactly which species were
originally created by God, and which ones are the result of
cross-breeding. Scientists may claim that they know, but there is
evidence that man prior to the flood had a great knowledge of
genetics and were perhaps able to cross-breed and produce animals
that would not normally be able to interbreed. It's quite possible
that there were not nearly as many animals on the ark as most people
think.
So, What is a "Dinosaur"? Today everyone is quite familiar with
the common concept of these incredible creatures- but the facts are
not what people would have you believe. While these giant bones had
been known for a long time, it wasn't until the last few hundred
years that men began to "theorize" about them. Before that, "The general opinion was that the
queer things probably were the bones of animals drowned in the Great
Flood - Noah's Flood." But there have always been those who
refused to accept God's truth. These men attempted to find
explanations for the things around them- explanations that their
feeble minds could comprehend. They rejected the idea of the
Creator. In 1869, Huxley coined a name for this type of thinking- he
called it "agnosticism"- the doctrine that there is no certain
knowledge as to the existence of God, a future life or the essential
nature of things. And who were the major adherents of this "new
religion"? "...Charles Darwin, Herbert Spencer,
Thomas Huxley, and other prominent scientists and men of letters in
England and America..." As we are all aware that it was Darwin
who did the most to promote the idea of evolution, we see that the
world today has been essentially "taught" by men who did not and do
not believe in God. They believe, in a nutshell, that the earth
sprang up from chaos, that this matter evolved into lower
life-forms, and over millions of years there were dinosaurs and
prehistoric men, and finally, here we are. Evolution became the
vogue ideology of the "learned" men. And one of their great
evidences for this theory is the dinosaur, whom we are today taught
lived millions of years ago. So what are the real facts? The huge fossil bones said to belong
to the Dinosauria are truly the largest bones ever found. Most are
reptilian and lizard-like "species" that are not found today. But,
they belong to "genuses" that do exist today. In fact, most of these
bones are almost identical to animals which live today, with the
exception of their size. But, this is a fact that you don't hear.
Simply put, the dinosaurs were gigantic reptiles and mammals for the
most part. But if that's the case, why don't we have them today? Why
were they so large back then?
Reptiles Grow in Size as Long as they Live The Bible says that before the flood,
men lived as long as 900 years and then some. If men lived that
long, why wouldn't the animals? And if they did live that long, note
this next fact: "...a reptile has the potential of
growing throughout its life..." Unlike other animals, the reptile has
no "cutoff" mechanism whereby it stops growing in size. So, even if
reptiles lived only half as long as pre-flood men, we would have to
expect gigantic reptiles before the flood. John MacKay once told me
that crocodiles (or was it alligators?) grew at the rate of 20 or so
feet per 100 years. If that's the case, there should be giant
alligators fossils, right? In 1991, alligator bones were found on
the banks of the Amazon River- the skull was almost 5 feet long.
Based on this, scientists estimated its height to have been 8 feet
and its length 40 feet. "Professor Carl Frailey, from Overland
Park, Kansas, said the creature probably weighed around 12 tones.
`This would make it about a tonne heavier than Tyrannosaurus Rex...
the mightiest of dinosaur predators', he said." In short, if reptiles today lived
longer, they would be "dinosaurs" in a few hundred years.
Other Giant Fossils What we don't hear about are all the
other giant fossils that have been found. "Giant animal fossils of
many different kinds have been found all over the world. A book
called Giants From the Past, published by the National Geographic
Society, shows many of these huge creatures of the past no longer
exist today. Fossil remains of the hornless
rhinoceros indicate it was over 17 feet tall. Pigs grew to be the
size of cattle; camels were over 12 feet tall; huge birds towered to
a height of over 11 feet; giant beavers grew to be the size of a
pig; deer antlers measured over 12 feet in width. Ground sloths
which grow to the size of an average monkey today, have been found
in the fossil record over 18 feet in length." Isn't it strange how
no one feels compelled to explain where these giants fall in the
"geologic time frame"? And not only the animals, but plant life was
much bigger, as well as man.
"Dinosaur" Bones Much Thicker than Today's Animals Galileo, in the 17th century, first
pointed out the principle of the "scale effect"- a lengthy subject,
but one we'll touch on briefly. The "scale effect" concerns simple
relationships of length to surface to volume and weight. His diagram
here shows that an the bones of an animal 3 times the length of a
present-day animal would have to increase in density far more than 3
times in order to support the bulk of the animal due to the
gravitational force. He wrote: "...it would be impossible to fashion
skeletons for men, horses or other animals which could exist or
carry out their functions proportionately when such animals were
increased to immense height- unless the bones were made of much
harder and more resistant material than the usual, or were deformed
by disproportionate thickening, so that the shape and appearance of
the animal would become monstrously gross." The giant bones of the antediluvians-
both men and animals, fulfill Galileo's observations. Scientists
don't recognize these massive bones as the same "kinds" of animals
we have today because their bones are extremely massive.
Why was Everything so much Bigger? If we go back to the Biblical account,
there is some information that is critical to a proper
understanding. GEN 2:5
...for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth,...6
But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face
of the ground. There was no rain before the flood- a mist watered
the earth. What this indicates is that the
temperature never fluctuated more than 10 or so degrees- if it did,
the water would condense into rain. But not only was the temperature
moderate and constant, the Bible gives another interesting fact: GEN 1:6
And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters,
and let it divide the waters from the waters. 7 And God made the
firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament
from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. What does all this mean? The answer is
in the next verse: GEN 1:8 And God called the firmament Heaven. This
"firmament" is here called "heaven"- does this mean the "Heaven"
that contains God's throne? No. That "Heaven" was already God's
habitation and in existence when He created the earth. This
"firmament" was the atmosphere around the earth. See Psalms 78:26,
104:12, 147:8 where the same Hebrew word for "heaven" is used.
What Genesis 1:6-8 tells us is that
God divided the earth's water - some of it was on the earth, while
some was set above the atmosphere. And while we don't really know
how this entire scenario worked, we do have some basic idea. A water
canopy surrounding the earth would result in what is known as a
"greenhouse effect". The entire earth would be of the same, constant
temperature. Harmful radiation would be filtered out by this canopy.
The sun's warmth would be diffused equally over the earth's surface.
In other words, the climate would be perfect; growing conditions
would be perfect. Lifespans of all living things would be
drastically increased due to the filtering out of the harmful
radiation. This gives a better understanding of this verse: PSA 67:6 Then shall the earth yield her increase;
and God, even our own God, shall bless us.
When the earth is restored to its
Edenic state, then will the nutrition again be perfect, complete
with the tree of life. And once again, man will grow to the stature
God intended him to be: MAL 4:2 But unto you that fear my name shall the
Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall
go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall .
What does the fossil record show?
Animals and plants of tremendous size, as well as sub-tropical
vegetation all over the world, including Alaska and Siberia. And
then we have the dinosaur bones. What effect would this sort of
environment have on reptiles? - "The ultimate proof that reptilian
growth usually works far below maximum capacity comes from what
happens when reptiles are kept in cages warmed to their favorite
temperature and are continuously provided with food. This turns out
to be the only way to accelerate an alligator's rate of growth to
the maximum: Keep it warmed all day long, seven days a week, and
keep forcing protein rich food into it. Most research scientists
couldn't afford to perform such an experiment, but the private
sector has come to the rescue. Alligator and crocodile skins sell to
a lucrative market for shoes and handbags, and since conservationist
measures restricted hunting of wild specimens, enterprising
businessmen started to farm them." Funny isn't it - the "enterprising"
alligator farmers unwittingly helped prove the effect of the
pre-flood environment on reptiles - accelerated growth.
The Geologic Column But another theory of our "learned
men" has also created confusion- the theory of the geologic column.
This "column" is a diagram of the various strata of the earth,
assigning ages to the times when the various strata were supposedly
deposited. I just love this theory, which of course is not
considered a "theory" but actual fact. Why do I love it? Because it
proves how gullible man really is. Let me explain- geologists are
taught that the age of a strata is determined by the fossils found
in it. OK, so how do you know the age of the fossils? The answer is
"by the strata they are found in!" It's all just theory- "circular
reasoning", based on the belief in evolution. And its a theory
completely riddled with holes. The real facts of the matter are that
the theory of evolution demands evidence of fossils of transitional
specimens- "missing links", so to speak. Yet, there are absolutely
no transitional specimens to be found anywhere. Most amazing is the
fact that Darwin, himself, wrote about this "fly in the ointment":
"Long before the reader has arrived at this part of my work, a crowd
of difficulties will have occurred to him. Some of them are so
serious that to this day I can hardly reflect on them without being
in some degree staggered.... Why if species have descended from
other species by fine gradations do we not see everywhere
innumerable transitional forms?... Why then is not every geological
formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology
assuredly does not reveal any such finely-graduated organic chain
and this perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which
can be urged against the theory...." Also to be noted is the fact
that nowhere does the actual strata of the earth match the "geologic
column". And the reason is simple- the theory is totally invalid.
The only explanation for the various strata and fossils found in
them is the explanation given in the Bible - the flood.
The Flood The description of the flood in
Genesis is incredibly short, but it says enough to let us know what
a tremendous catastrophe occurred: GEN 7:11
...the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up,
and the windows of heaven were opened. All the water contained in the earth
was "broken up"- and the waters above the atmosphere came hurtling
down to the earth. Now, if all this doesn't sound particularly
violent to you, think again. Before the flood, a tremendous amount
of water was suspended above the atmosphere in the "canopy" and also
great quantities were in aquifers in the earth. All of this water,
most of which is now contained in the oceans, came exploding out and
down at the same time, as we read in Gen. 7:11. The force of this
cataclysm had to be far greater than any nuclear explosion man could
dream of. Then, when it was over with, the entire planet was
completely covered in water. All life was extinguished except for
those on the ark. The tremendous currents and tidal
waves would have had such force that the face of the planet was
marred and scarred beyond description. All matter except the bedrock
had to have been engulfed in the turmoil. To better understand, if
you take a bottle of water, place soil, pebbles, grass, leaves,
etc., in it and then shake it up, you can see on a tiny scale what
had to have occurred. But, during the flood, it was more than soil,
pebbles and grass- it was everything, including animals, men, women
and children, homes,- everything on the face of the planet. Nothing
would be the same after it was all over.
The Earth During the Flood Everything on the earth's surface was
in liquid suspension, the only thing remaining stable being the
bedrock. And in this "earth soup" were the bodies of thousands,
perhaps even millions, of "dinosaurs"- some gigantic and some as
small as our lizards today. As the turmoil lessened, the debris in
the water began to settle. The heaviest and densest materials
naturally settled to the bottom first. But, the turmoil was not
consistent over the entire planet, so some areas experienced some
settling before others did. Also, as the waves and currents
travelled continually over the face of the earth, new debris would
be washed into some areas after initial settling had begun,
producing multiple settlement, or "strata". The heaviest matter would have
included uranium, the heaviest element. As this was deposited at the
greatest depth, and more earth and matter settled upon it with great
force, the radioactive decay of the uranium, radium and etc., caused
tremendous heat at the bottom of the sediments. The rocks were
melted at these sites. The water coming in contact with this
tremendous heat produced incredible amounts of steam. This volcanic
activity caused upheaval of the earth- great mountain chains were
thrusted up. Volcanoes spouted lava in great quantities. One effect
of this upheaval was that the entire equilibrium of the earth was
disturbed. The delicate balance which kept the earth rotating on its
axis was interrupted numerous times and the planet shifted its
entire bulk, which further thrusted and tore the surface. Evidence
that the earth shifted on its axis numerous times in a very short
time period is proven by rocks such as magnetite. During their
formation, these rocks developed lines within them which aligned
with magnetic north. Magnetite specimens have been found which
display as many as 10 or more different alignments, proving that
during the time that the rock was cooling, the earth changed its
magnetic poles at least 10 times. And during this tremendous cataclysm,
some of the huge bodies of the gigantic "dinosaurs" were buried deep
in the earth, along with everything else. Due to their density, many
were buried in a deeper layer than the lighter animals, but not
always. As the currents and waves continued, more debris was
deposited, again settling out according to its weight and density.
This resulted in a "layering" effect- or strata. Finally, we read
that the rain stopped. GEN 8:1
...and God made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters
asswaged;...3 And the waters returned from off the earth
continually:... As we mentioned, the story of the
flood is extremely short, considering the events which occurred. And
therefore, we must know that every word in the account is important.
The fact that a "wind" is mentioned as passing over the earth to
help dry the waters indicates that this was no little wind. In order
for this wind to have any effect on the incredible amount of water
on the face of the earth, it would have had to have been greater
than any hurricane or tornado we can imagine. It must have been of
absolutely incredible force, actually forceful enough to move masses
of earth. And as this earth was moved around, some water was able to
return back into the earth, and some was evaporated, but the
majority of water remained in the incredibly deep chasms that now
contain the oceans. And as the water receded into the
earth, the fossilization of the animals buried deep in the earth
began.
How the Dinosaur Bones Became Fossilized Have you ever wondered why we don't
find plants and dead animals in the process of petrifying today? If,
like the evolutionists want us to believe, all the fossils are from
thousands and millions of years ago, why don't we see things being
fossilized today? Think about this because it's very important.
If what scientists tell us is true-
that all the fossils in the earth's layers are from various geologic
times,- why aren't things being fossilized today? The answer is
simple. In order for living things to become petrified, certain
circumstances must exist. 1-
The object must be buried rapidly in order to prevent deterioration
through decay and rot. Today, if an animal dies in the forest or
jungle, it soon decays away if it isn't first eaten by other
animals. It can't possibly petrify unless it is preserved. 2- There must be continual water flow
over and around the buried object. Petrification is the replacement
of each molecule of the animal bone (for example) by mineral matter-
as the water flows over the object, it washes away a molecule.
Immediately a tiny mineral molecule plugs the hole left by the
washed-away molecule. In this manner, even the cellular structure is
sometimes perfectly preserved. The massive amount of fossils in the
earth today could only have been preserved by an incredible amount
of water flow over an incredible amount of rapidly-buried plants and
animals. Ask any paleontologist to find you bones being petrified
today- it just isn't happening. Oh, there may be one or two recent
examples, but I guarantee they are as rare as hen's teeth.
Forgeries, Lies and Fantasy The whole idea of evolution is based
on the supposition that there is no God. You read Darwin's own
observation about the total absence of transitional forms. Our
problem is that we no longer choose to think for ourselves. We have
gotten lazy- we sit back and let the "scientist and learned men"
tell us what to believe. The "learned men" who believe that life
evolved from chaos and evolved over millions of years say that the
similarities in different kinds of animals are the result of their
evolving from a common ancestor, when in fact these very
similarities are staggering proof of a common Creator. I felt literally sick the last time we
went to the Smithsonian dinosaur display as I overheard parents
telling their children how many millions of years ago each dinosaur
lived. And then I got angry as I realized what was happening- those
precious children were being taught that the Bible was a lie. That
realization hit me like a ton of bricks in my face. I never felt so
helpless as I did that day. How can we expect people to have faith
in our precious Jesus if they cannot believe the Word of God?
How Much do the Scientists Really Know? Have you ever heard of the "Piltdown
Man"? Back in 1912, two men announced that they had found the
so-called missing link between ape and man. Their evidence was a few
pieces from a skull, a piece of a jaw, some teeth and a few other
fragments. It wasn't until 1953 that the whole
affair was exposed for the elaborate hoax it really was. The
fragments turned out to be parts of a human brain case, a piece of
the mandible of some sort of ape, fragments of hippopotamus, deer
and beaver teeth, and other fragments of elephant, mastodon and
rhinoceros. It's a long story, but its now common knowledge and well
documented that it was a hoax. And it may seem harmless to you now
that its been exposed. But, did you know that over 500 people
obtained their PhD by writing their thesis on "the Piltdown Man"? I
dare say, no one took back those PhDs after it was exposed, and
those people taught hundreds of thousands of people. Then there's the dinosaur evidence.
I'll bet most of you think that entire skeletons have been found of
all the dinosaurs- after all, that's what you see in the museums and
in the science books. But that's not exactly the case: "Many
dinosaurs are so poorly known, they have been identified by only a
few shed teeth, a tradition fraught with scientific problems. From
just a few pointy teeth Troodon formosus...was one of the first
dinosaurs named, more than a century ago....But for a century not
much more of Troodon than its teeth were known. You would be very surprised and
probably shocked if you knew just how little evidence some of these
dinosaurs are based on. You can gain a little insight into some of
the problems by reading about the early dinosaur hunters. Two of the
most prominent of these were Cope and Marsh who searched for the
giant fossils in the 1800's. As two of the original "founding
fathers" of this new science, they were vicious competitors. They
found and named no telling how many new species of dinosaurs, but
there were just a few problems with their research. For one, they were so fiercely
competitive that they would secretly plant bones in each other's dig
sites. If this doesn't seem like such a big deal, you must
understand that these dinosaur skeletons don't come "assembled"
except in very rare cases, and then its only portions of the
skeleton that are connected. No, dinosaurs are reconstructed from
bones found together in an area. Therefore, there's a very good
chance that many of the "specimens" these men came up with are just
not valid. Here's evidence: "When in 1877 O.C. Marsh found the
type specimen of Brontosaurus, now in the Carnegie Museum, the
original lacked the skull. Marsh assumed that the skull was short
and round, like that of the similar but smaller Camarasaurus. For a
century, incomplete Brontosaurus skeletons and statues and pictures
of the animals as they presumably appeared in life...were given
these bullet heads. Then, it transpired that Brontosaurus actually
had a long, narrow skull like that of Diplodicus. It will take years
to correct this error everywhere." Here's even more evidence that Cope
and Marsh really hoodwinked the public with some of their
"discoveries": "The rivalry was heated. Prospectors
fought off Indians, fired at each other, hid their finds, and
appropriated their rivals' discoveries....Nearly every find was
dubbed a new species. Many of the 136 dinosaur species Cope and
Marsh named over the next two decades have since been invalidated."
Or, how about this?- "Another time, Marsh's men, knowing
that Cope was spying on them, deliberately mixed the skull of one
creature with teeth from another and left them for Cope to find and
describe as a new species." It should be quite obvious by now that
our "knowledge" of dinosaurs isn't based on the most solid evidence.
Most bones are found in jumbled piles, with many, many different
animals being represented. As we said earlier, nearly complete
specimens are extremely rare, which leaves us at the complete mercy
of the person "reconstructing" the skeleton. For example, when Gideon Mantell drew
his reconstruction of the skeleton of the Iguanodon, he placed the
"spike-like" object on the nose, similar to the rhinoceros horn.
Later, this was proved to be wrong, but the misconception persisted
for many years. They have since placed this "spike" as the thumb,
but who knows- this could one day change, too. But this problem of over-active
imaginations didn't end with the old dinosaur-hunters. Take the
example of Jim Jensen who only retired in 1985: "But there were other problems with
Jensen's naming of his giants. Though based on prepossessing
fossils, those fossils are but fragments from a jumbled quarry. And
they could only be contrasted with other fragments of already named
but still only partially known dinosaurs." Today, everyone loves dinosaurs. But
what we see in the museums and science books are not reality. Years
ago, Ron remembers seeing a Life Magazine cover which featured a man
holding a fossil tooth- the caption went something like this: "From this single tooth, I can
reconstruct an entire dinosaur..." And that's closer to the truth than
scientists would like to admit. When you go to the museum and view a
"Triceratops" skeleton, it's only natural to believe that the
skeleton is real, or at least a copy of a real skeleton, right?
Think again, as we read this quote about them: "And they are principally known from
their skulls. Unlike the pattern for most dinosaurs, for ceratopsids
skulls are relatively abundant, their postcranial remains are rare.
Not one complete skeleton of the familiar Triceratops is known."
The bottom line is simply this-
"dinosaurs" existed alongside all the other pre-flood animals, most
of which were also giants (when they were full grown) compared to
the animals of today. But, the fossil bones of the dinosaurs prove
that they were animals of the same genuses we have today. Many may
be species that no longer survive. But, the only real knowledge we
have of them is scant. Most of what you read as "fact" is
actually the conjecture of those with vivid imaginations, always
seeking to come up with something new and exciting. Yet, these are
the very ones who scream the loudest that the Biblical account is
the real theory. The real facts- the only ones we can depend on- are
that these dinosaur bones are the fossil remains of animals of
tremendous size; many of them reptiles which lived in an environment
that allowed them to live hundreds of years, continuing to grow in
size until their death. The presence of their fossilized bones in
the water-laid strata bears the most incredible testimony to their
utter destruction at the Hands of their Creator during the great
flood. 1.,2.
Man, Time and Fossils, by Ruth Moore, p. 114. 3.
The New Larned History, Vol 1, p. 119. 4.
Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1984, Vol. 15, p. 279. 5.
Creation Ex-Nihilo, Vol. 14, No. 2. 6.
The Bible-Key to Understanding the Early Earth, by McLean, Oakland
and McLean, p. 59 & 60. 7.
Two New Sciences, by Galileo Galilei; translated by Stillman Drake,
p. 127-128. 8.
The Dinosaur Heresies, by Robert T. Bakker, p. 350. 9.
Origin of Species, by Charles Darwin, p. 80 & 157; quoted from A
Scientific Analysis of Genesis, by Edward F. Blick. 10.
Dinosaurs Rediscovered, by Don Lessem, p. 29. 11.
The Day of the Dinosaur, by de Camp and de Camp, p. 121. 12.
Dinosaurs Rediscovered, p. 38. 13.
The Day of the Dinosaur, p. 223. 14.
Dinosaurs Rediscovered, p. 174. 15. Ibid., p. 277. Were dinosaurs on the ark? How
dinosaur bones were fossilized and much more.
©2006 Discovery News / Biblical Archeology / Noah's Ark / Chariot
Wheels in the Red Sea / Dinosaurs / Ooparts or Out of Place
Artifacts / Biblical Prophecy / Creation Science / Fossils / Geology
/ Native American Rock Art / All of these discoveries confirm the
accuracy of the Bible. |
CLICK HERE to return to the DINOSAUR INDEX
Aol users must request information by using the following email:
OTHER INDEX FILES:
Copy right Discovery News 2016 Were dinosaurs on the ark? How dinosaur bones were fossilized and much more.